Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Killer Queen

First we had Stevie Wonder. Then Barry Manilow. Then Kenny Rogers. I wondered what fossil of the music industry American Idol would dig up next to hand-hold and fuck with the contestants as they struggled through another theme week. Well, they managed to top themselves. They actually did resurrect a dead man this week by having the kids perform the songs of Queen. The late, great Freddie Mercury may be gone, but tonight he was far from forgotten.


Much to learn, from the elders, there is. That's what Nigel and Simon are trying to tell us, and the contestants. They should be absorbing and growing with the advice generously being handed out by these wise and ancient ones, who are surely doing this without agenda, but purely from the goodness of their hearts, without regard to sales of their new albums.

So. Take their advice and learn we shall. On with the Show.

Bucky singing "Fat Bottomed Girls" was perfect for him. I like Bucky. He seems like a cool guy. I liked the Court TV story that came out about him this week, I like his manner, I like the way he blinks really hard, and I like his gravelly voice. He was fun, and I was glad for him. But I still have a feeling he's going to hit the bottom three with Ace, and possibly even Elliott again this week. Not that Elliott should be there after the performance he gave, but I think this week is definitely an acid test regarding the weight of the judges opinions and how heavily people vote on a "personality" that they like versus who's giving the best performances. The only one, the only one who seems to successfully straddle the vocal/performance line is Taylor, and I think it's obvious that Simon is gunning for him to not even make the finals anymore. Is he that much of a marketing nightmare, this guy?

Anyhow, back to the singing and performances.

Ace sang "We Will Rock You." He did not rock. Soon, Ace, we will STONE you if you don't get off the stage. From the pre-performance clip, we learned that Brian May took an intense dislike to Ace, which was understandable considering that even after the band explained that they weren't going to play their song differently for him, he tried to cajole them into it, forcing them to get standoffish with him. What I don't understand is why the producers insist on humiliating the kids just moments before they have to take the stage by showing these negative interactions. Well. I understand it with Ace, because it's a little funny. The even funnier part of it all was his performance. Believe it or not, it was the best Ace's voice has ever sounded, and yet on the whole he was just fey and pathetic, like a gelding. Or Clay Aiken. But because of him we did get the pleasure of hearing Paula say "bastardized". Nice.

Kelly doing "Bohemian Rhapsody" didn't hit the heights of stupendously bad as I'd hoped, but it was pretty damn close! She didn't kill the Queen song, but she sure did strangle it into submission. She came out looking like a blonde Joan Jett, tottering around on stilettos while singing completely off key. When she started moving around the stage and flouncing herself onto her knees, the only thing lacking was a pole for her to shimmy around. And the funniest part was watching the entire judging panel and their staunch defense of her abysmal performance, telling her she'd pulled it off. For her stupid move of the week, she pretended she didn't know what the phrase "on paper" meant, but then turned around in the next breath and said that Simon uses strange "terminology."

Chris. Well, Chris also came out looking like a bald Joan Jett with his freshly groomed eyebrows and black eyeliner and even a dash of lipcolor on! I was truly scandalized. I hadn't seen a "rocker" that tarted up since Axl Rose was back in the jungle. Honestly, I always figured his ultra-butch act would appeal to the gay contingent, but I never figured he'd outright court that vote, even on Queen week. But damned if he didn't. I almost give him credit. Too bad he insisted on glaring at the camera and screaming another crappy song. Can you imagine? I learned a new Queen song thanks to him. Because Chris actually sifted through the entire Queen repertoire to find "Innuendo" -- a song that was droning and bland enough to fit his sensibilities.

[Tangent] Please move along to End Tangent if you have no use for my idiotic sermon here. I've been questioned about my venom toward Chris. Well. Here it is.

What is my problem with Chris? Authenticity, credibility, and cool. I'll hit the "cool" card next week, because I'm sure he'll still be dragging around. So here's the authenticity one for this week: Call me a traditionalist, but there's a line between pop and rock, and that line has more to do with authenticity than with time signatures and instrumentation. Pop music can be manufactured. It's not unusual to have a great songwriter pen the lyrics/music and have a band put together and then a singer brought in. That's called production, and it can have wonderful results. I have nothing against pop music, trust me.

But rock-n-roll is more organic, it's more visceral. Rock-n-roll happens when frustrated people tap into a creative well amongst themselves and write/sing/perform, and it's something with raw power. Rock has been on the ropes several times, and it's had a number of so-called touted "saviors." There was the skinny kid from Jersey, and then there was the skinny kid from Seattle. With the declining popularity of rock, it's flush for another "savior" to come along. But I guarantee that savior isn't someone cut from the black denim cloth of Chris Daughtry. Chris Daughtry is symptomatic of everything that's currently wrong with the state of rock.

First off, those forumulaic, heavy-driving songs that've been playing for the past several years are not rock. They're heavy pop is what they are. Rock morphs and changes, and the next wave of rock won't sound like grating Soundgarden knock-offs. That's why Pearl Jam, Nirvana, and Soundgarden exploded with the "grunge" sound back when it first appeared: Cause it was different. They merged punk and rock and injected it with poppy hooks to breathe a new life into the stale "classic rock" repertoire. But the sound has morphed and flattened since then. Bands like Creed managed to drain the edge and speed -- and anger and joy -- out of it by sampling and popularizing the slower songs and forgetting just how glorious a fast, three-chord, simple arrangement can be.

These bands now have a packaged and groomed flavor. And if Chris likes that kind of music, that's fine. Since that's the popular status quo, and since that kind of music can be manufactured, I guess he could do well commercially. However, there's a catch. Even though it is manufactured, to retain some semblance of respectability, it has to APPEAR to be a little bit "real". How exactly is Chris supposed to pull off that trick by becoming the winner of American Idol? Right now, the weapons of mass destruction argument has more credibility than Chris Daughtry.

Chris, listen. The producers are going to give you some really shitty music to record as they assemble a band behind you and then send you out to perform like the trained seal you've become. Bitch, please. Dave Grohl would bitch-slap your sorry, bald-headed face. And then he'd beat you about the head and shoulders with that stupid wallet chain you insist on wearing.

People no longer question an artist's integrity when they sell out their songs to commercials (though I notice Springsteen and Nirvana still haven't done it) because we're a money and fame obsessed society. But I, and plenty of others, still aren't so far gone we're willing to give up the last vestiges of our soul by sacrificing one of the true American art forms up to the cult of commercialism. I don't blame Chris Daughtry for searching for his piece of the American Dream or for fame-whoring or selling out. Because I don't think he ever had anything TO sell out. I wish him luck and hope he makes lots of money. But he's about as close to a real "rocker" as I am to Lester Bangs, dig?

For me, the only way Chris could retain some dignity and cool at this point would be if he'd acknowledge that what he was showing as his previous taste in music was a joke, that he views this whole competition as a joke, admit he was after fame and money for HIS band and then go out on a gloriously high note by sanctimoniously performing Adam Sandler's "Lunch Lady Land," while somehow getting Ace to do the accompanying Chris Farley dance.

[/ End Tangent]

Anyhow.

Katherine I think became the diva she's always wanted to be tonight, at least in her mind. She looked gorgeous in the red satin and just threw her arms out in the broadway-Jesus pose as she belted away, and despite being off-key a couple times, she pulled it off and I'm sure her fans ate it up. Again, it struck me as very rehearsed though, and she was entirely too convinced she'd "arrived". I wouldn't be shocked if she's in the bottom three again. Cause while it was *close* to being a wow performance, I think with it being dead in the middle of show and then being followed by Elliott and especially Taylor, she might get forgotten.

Taylor rocked it with "Crazy Little Thing Called Love," even if it did take him TWO ultra rehearsed kicks to get the mic stand knocked over. That was a bit odd. I mean, once it didn't work the first time, you'd think he'd have moved on. But maybe there's a bit of OCD to his personality and he had to complete that maneuver before jigging around to the other side of the stage to do his wobbly-knee move. I liked him anyhow. Like I said, I thought his voice sounded great even though he was bopping around so much, and at the end he got a nice gritty sound to bring it home.

Simon, of course, hated him and asked him if he was drunk. I knew it'd be too much for Taylor to say, "Of course!" Instead he said, "No, not at all!" This led to an interesting exchange where Randy said "Simon's drunk," and Seacrest had to reply, "Someone at that table is drunk." So it's now two weeks in a row that Ryan's told us that someone at the judge's table is hopped up. Yeah. We watch the show. We saw Leno last night. We know Paula's bombed, like, all the fucking time. We've known for years. That's why she's so cheery and sweet to everyone, cause she's high! So the way they've decided to deal with it this year is to unleash her and let her hog press about how she was recently assaulted, so we can assume that she's on "painkillers" for her back again and everyone can make a joke about it like she's the resident Karen Walker of the show. I have no beef with that. As a chick who's often chemically altered myself, I like it when it's considered funny instead of pathetic.

Oh, and speaking of chemically altered, was I the only one who thought that Roger Taylor looked like he was shrooming in those pre-performance clips?

Anyhow, back to Taylor Hicks. He really is getting fucked with lately by the producers. We learned he changed his song this week. But actually, it's two weeks in a row that his song choice has been yanked away from him in the late stages. Last week, he suffered because of it, but this week, he done really good and got backhanded by Simon anyhow.

Paris, she came out looking like an actual drag queen. Really. Like a drag queen impression of a dominatrix Liza Minelli doing a bastardized Freddie Mercury cover song. I knew she'd rock the Mercury-style fashion, but I thought she'd pull it off. She didn't. The outfit was like the skin on a wiener, and with the spike-heeled boots and long hair it was a mismatch with her age. Simon called it weird, and I agree. She belted, but it was all very anti-climactic after the one-two punch of Elliott and Taylor lighting it up before her.

So that brings me back to Elliott. Yes, I bastardized the order of the night so I could pour my unfettered love on him at the end here. What can I say? He looked hot. Sounded hotter. He nailed the song from start to finish, and though Simon said it had some pitch problems, I really didn't hear that at all. (But I also think that his faint praise it to be expected at this point, lest Elliott and Taylor become actual threats to his chosen favorites.) To prove I'm not blind to faults, I will say he had a couple awkward moves in there with the one-arm sway (but that didn't come close to Ace's stomp-stomp-clap at the start of his number) and his ending leg kick.

Also, as a writer, I had to cringe when he said it was "ironic" that this soulful song was written with the Queen of Soul, Aretha Franklin, in mind. Ironic is a word that's been bastardized and misused plenty. Which is kind of funny, because ironic means "the opposite of what's expected or appropriate" and people, including Elliott in this clip, used ironic exactly opposite of what it means. It's not ironic that a soulful song was written with Aretha Franklin in mind, or that you're drawn to it because you love soul, Elliott. It's fitting. Ironic song choice would be if you sang Def Leppard's "Pour Some Sugar On Me." Really. (That joke is for the hardcore Elliott fans out there.)

Nevertheless, I still love Elliott. One misuse of "ironic" couldn't but a damper on my infamously inappropriate crush. And tonight proved why he really shouldn't be such a dark-horse in the competition, cause he sang the hell out of "Somebody To Love." Vocally, his vibrato was just right, his tone was awesome for the first half, he hit a nice, attention-grabbing glory note in the middle, and then he put some serious stink on it for the whole second half of the number and finished up strong. I think people have sort of overwhelming expectations of Elliott, because he does have such a good voice and they either love him so much or they really dislike him intensely. So I'm not sure they'll ever be happy. But if you look at what he's put together on this show so far, at the consistency he brings every week with in-tune, great vocals, I don't think there's ever been a steadier, better singer on this show. People say they're waiting for his break-out performance, but after doing "Moody's Mood," "Teach Me Tonight" and now "Somebody To Love" and singing the everloving hell out of them, I can't understand why he's not a front-runner. I just can't. To me, it's completely fucking ironic that the best singer, as he's proven time and again, is still given short-shrift by the voters.

And, you know, I could kind of understand if he had a noxious personality. But I don't see that in him at all. If anything, he always comes across like a complete sweetheart. Like last week, when he was on the chopping block with Mandisa, he didn't seem squirmy or petulant (Katharine), nor did he have that air of entitlement (Paris) when he was told he was safe. He seemed genuinely happy for the people that were safe, and really disappointed for Mandisa. He just seems…cool. Genuinely cool, in a real person way. Not in the put-on, acting way (Chris).

I'm not advocating voting for Elliott cause he seems like a nice guy. I don't buy into the theory that people "deserve" some things in life because they're nice or because they've had it rough. I think something like this should be earned. What I am saying is that week after week, Elliott Yamin is earning this title, and I hope viewers catch on to that. The absolute worst part of his performance this week? The band. I think Elliott needs to pull the Bo Bice move and go a capella on the shit soon.

So. Anyhow. Where does that leave us? We learned this week that as far as celebrity mentors go, dead men come off best because we don't compare their bad plastic surgery. We learned that you don't willy-nilly try to bastardize a legendary band's arrangements, even if they're shrooming. We learned that Paula's not shrooming, she's just her garden-variety drunk as usual. We remembered that Freddie Mercury is a rock legend, but that doesn't stop us from putting him through the commercial grist-mill that is American Idol, or stop his band-mates from pimping themselves in such a manner. We learned that a gay cabaret night of Queen songs is very entertaining, especially when you've got a stripper (Pickler), the butch biker dude (Chris) and a drag queen (Paris) to pull it off, along with a self-anointed diva (Katharine) to be the topper.

And we learned who's got the chops to actually pull off the singing of the aforementioned legend's songs. Who's on a level with Freddie Mercury? No one. That's right, not even our darling Elliott can make us forget Freddie. And no one has Freddie's star wattage or showmanship, not even Taylor. But shit, that's Freddie Mercury. He's dead. Let him be a legend. But at least a couple of people didn't mangle the songs into dogshit because they do have serious chops. But I'm also afraid that tomorrow we're going to learn that having the chops just ain't enough. But hopefully it will be enough, and the right people will still be alive in this thing.

And we've also, as a bonus, learned that I am not Lester Bangs. (But I think I've also learned that I am secretly harboring a fantasy to someday gun for HH's job.)

Anyhow, I hope the voters toss a bastardized kink into the routine and vote off someone who deserves to go (Ace). That'd be a lesson for all of us.

Queen on AI

And now we are really back to AI.

(It's either talk about that or how Michael Keaton slapped down the Pirates before tossing out the first pitch yesterday at the ballgame. I always liked Batman.)

Fluffed by Don, there's this tidbit about what the Idol hopefuls will be singing tonight.

Dear. Lord.

This, fitting for Queen, has all the operatic underpinnings to become one of the best American Idol shows ever. Seriously. I'll be so crushed if it deflates into boringness. It's got potential disaster (Kellie), raunch (Bucky), drama (Ace), and triumph (our Elliott!) scripted right into it with those song choices.

Thank you, Nigel.

Monday, April 10, 2006

New Story at Ruthie's

For those who enjoy my particular brand of smut, I have a new story up at Ruthie's Club (<--children don't click that link!) this week. It's their big Pirate Festival! Gar! My story is called "Beyond the Sea" and the artwork was done by Andrea & Ale.

More good news concerning my smut coming very soon.

Sunday, April 09, 2006

IZ

And we're back to American Idol again. But not really. Only kind of. Taylor's rendition last week of "Take Me Home Country Roads" set me off in a different direction, and I'm glad it did. It got me to dig up a CD I hadn't listened to in a while, just to hear that version of the song again and remind myself of how different the same basic material can be with different interpretations. Because even though I fairly dislike that song, there's a version that I love, and it's by Israel Kamakawiwo'ole, also known simply as Iz.

If you don't think you've ever heard Iz before, you're wrong. You have. You just didn't know it was him. You know that lullaby, sweet-sounding version of "Over the Rainbow/What A Wonderful World" that was used in a commercial several years ago? And then it was used in a plethora of films, most recently as the closing song for "50 First Dates". Well that haunting voice and ukulele strumming rendition is by Iz. Both that song and "Country Roads" can be found on his CD Facing Future.



Along with those two tracks, you'll find a selection of traditional Hawaiian songs along with some of Iz's more contemporary (contemporary for 1993) tunes. I love this CD. I don't know why I put it down for so long. Maybe you're already familiar with Iz. But if not, I think you'll dig him, and this CD is a great place to start.

Mahalo.

Friday, April 07, 2006

Ellen Meister

My pal Ellen Meister is so cool. It's only a short wait now for her soon-to-be blockbuster "Secret Confessions of the Applewood PTA" to be released. And now I hear that superstar and my favorite Friend, Lisa Kudrow will be reading the audio version! GO ELLEN! Go Lisa! (Lisa's show The Comeback was my favorite show of last summer.)

And, Ellen is also really nice to me. She was kind enough to put up one of my stories on her blog today. Thank you, Ellen!

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Yippee ki yay. Motherfuck.

Remember Die Hard, when Bruce Willis busted out that great line, "Yippee ki yay, motherfucker" and how perfectly it fit him and the moment? Okay, now remember later in the movie when the bad guy was taunting him and in his German accent he said, "Yippee ki yay. Motherfuck." It was funny because it was so wrong. Yeah. That was American Idol last night: Funny and wrong because it just didn't fit. (And yes, I'm also aware how funny and wrong it is for me to devote so much time writing about it week after week. Nevertheless.)

I don't generally like country music. I don't know country music. But I'm not one of those music snobs who thinks that if I don't like something, it sucks. My tastes in music are eclectic and vast. I'm always up for listening to something new and hopefully enjoying it. That said, it's a damn good thing I view American Idol as an entertainment show and not as a gateway to exposing myself to various music genres to then be judged as a whole. Cause if I was doing the latter -- judging the genre after watching last night -- I'd say that country music blows.

For some reason, I thought last week's "Songs of the 21st Century" theme was going to be the low point of AI this year. But I honestly think this week they managed to inject a little more cheeze and drain a bit more fun out of it. Every year, they tout the contestant pool as the most talented, the most charismatic, the most versatile, ect. But it really hasn't seemed that way for the past couple weeks.

I don't mind Kenny Rogers. I kinda like Kenny Rogers. However, if I had looked at my TV screen and just seen that guy without being told it was Kenny Rogers, I wouldn't have known it was Kenny Rogers. I thought we'd hit the nadir of plastic-corpselike visages when Barry Manilow was looking like a Nip/Tuck refugee, all pink and raw like a chem-peel mess. But hey, at least he still looked like Barry Manillow. Last night they trotted out Kenny Rogers who just doesn't even remotely resemble Kenny Rogers anymore. My question is this: Does the vanity in these two over-aged guys seriously run so deep that they're doing this to themselves willingly? Or do they have "people" telling them they need to nip, tighten and tuck to stay contemporary and hip? Cause I have news for them. They never were contemporary and hip. Or good looking. But at least they used to look like human beings instead of microwaved Madame Tussaud's rejects.

And since I'm already on Kenny's ass -- what the fuck did he do to my Elliott? That was some of the lamest, stupidest advice I've ever heard, telling Elliott to sing it more simply. "You're not trying to impress people, you're trying to make them cry." Since fucking when? Look, I know Kenny Rogers was hella popular in his day and I've got no beef with his performing skills. But just like not everyone is a performer, not everyone should be a teacher, either. And boy did he lead my boy astray last night, which really pisses me off. Like Elliott doesn't have enough to overcome to stay in this thing already.

1) He first showed up on TV looking like he'd just climbed out of a tree after baking a batch of Fudge Stripes. Oh yeah, the stylists have accomplished the mission and he's cute as hell now, but people have much longer memories concerning flaws than they have for good things.

2) His recurring case of the nerves, which seemed to nearly strangle his stage presence last night. He gained ground the previous week, he lost it this week. The white-knuckle double fisting of the mic is what made me want to cry, not his "simplified" voice.

3) The fact that he's pretty much the only bona-fide amateur left in this competition is a potentially fatal handicap. He outright mentioned "pressure" last night. As the lone remaining amateur, he shouldn't be feeling this. He oughta be having fun. I know that's easier said than done. If it was me up there in front of cameras and lights and people and getting publicly judged, that would make me cry. But when he first started on the show, Elliott actually seemed to like it, because he seemed to be one of the two people in the competition (along with Taylor) that loved music and had genuine talent for it.

4) His seeming willingness to take criticism and advice and incorporate it may actually be a detriment to him at this point. Last night, he (and Taylor) seemed hamstrung by expectations. It's as though their self-awareness is deteriorating to self-consciousness and it's making them freeze little by little and actually lose themselves, and not in a good way. It's very Zen, this idea of losing yourself to find yourself, and that's something both Elliott and Taylor did at the outset of this show without effort. While Ace is always completely self-conscious of his tenny-bopper, crushable "image" and Chris is overwhelmed with always looking "cool", Elliott and Taylor just turned it on. But it seems like they've both listened to criticisms and tried to make subtle (or severe) changes to accommodate. Sometimes that's good. Sometimes, like last night, it's not.

The interesting thing is that last night, Elliott and Taylor still *sounded* the best of everyone. But both of them looked uncomfortable on the stage. I make jokes about Taylor, because it's easy. But I honestly like him. I thought last week when he sang "Trouble" it was a smart move. But last night was bad, bad, fucking bad. He's always had a different vibe to him; a near-manic edge which I dug in his performances. It was just that Tom Cruise-like, fake, scientology smile he'd get when being judged that I got twitchy for him. For some reason, the more still Taylor is, the more the manic edge bleeds out and collapses in on itself. When he's moving around and singing and performing, the tense energy has an outlet and purpose.

I don't recall what Kenny's advice to Taylor was, but it was probably stupid. (Anyone?) But when he told Elliott to "simplify", I was immediately pissed. Bad, bad, fucking bad. Elliott does NOT need to make people cry at this point. He DOES need to impress them if he wants to stay alive in this thing. And the way he can impress people is with his singing. By singing stuff his way, whatever is natural to him. Don't get me wrong. I still thought he sounded great last night. It was a lousy, maudlin song to start with, and that was amplified by the opening which was simple. He did end up easing into it though and by the end he was back to singing like Elliott Yamin. But that sort of sketchy hesitancy at the outset won't help him. And that sort of sketchy hesitancy, I think, comes from him thinking about how to do it instead of just doing it. And I blame Kenny Rogers for that. Kenny, he can sing, he can roast chicken, but he shouldn't be giving voice lessons to a soul singer.

And, since I'm on a negative trip today, I hear Rod Stewart is coming up soon on the show. I love standards. Love, love standards. But those "Great American Songbook" albums of Stewart's piss me off. Great songs, great orchestra, great arrangements, and then his warbly voice marring everything. I could be wrong -- maybe he'll be a great coach. But it strikes me that Rod Stewart giving voice lessons is akin to Ving Rhames giving haircare tips. Anyhow. That'll be for another week.

Back to last night. Let's break this down Eastwood-style: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

The Ugly

Mandisa, Paris, Ace
Mandisa can belt a tune, but when she's not belting, she's shrill as hell. I wanted to like her, but I'm over her. Totally. And yes, only part of it is her voice. The other part is her preaching. I thought the way she addressed Simon and so self-righteously bestowed forgiveness on him was condescending. But, fuck it, Simon deserves to be condescended to sometimes. But I'm not getting past her choir-girl routine from last week. There is a line between humbly showing your love for God and being arrogant about that belief. Mandisa catapulted over the line.

Paris hits the low notes that Mandisa misses, but that's seemingly all she hits. She sings everything in such a low register it's gotten annoying. I first noticed it when she did "Wind Beneath My Wings" and I've been waiting for her smooth-sounding voice to return ever since. It hasn't. It's over.

And then there's Ace.
Those over-blushed cheeks and that Katie Holmes "I've just been indoctrinated into the cult of Scientology" camera eye-fuck doesn't exactly freak me out, but it's uncomfortable. It's phony. And if it's not phony, then it does freaks me out. A falsetto doesn't make a singer. But as a singer, he's a falsetto. He sucks and he really needs go.

I'll admit something nasty about myself here. Last year? I voted for Constantine. Every week. Not because I liked him, but because I loathed him. Constantine's arrogance combined with his greasy but ballsy performances were a television aphrodisiac of irritation for me. I voted for him because I couldn't stand him, and that made for great entertainment. The next day in the office we'd gather and talk about Constantine and how grotesque it was to watch him and we'd laugh and laugh. So we voted to keep him around for a while, because it was just so funny and wrong. This year, we were hoping we had our Constantine in Ace. From the first moment Paula swooned and I (and my office mates) felt nothing but contempt for him, we figured we had it made this season. But alas, it was never to be. He never hit the glorious, fatuous heights that Constantine seemed to glide right past. He's just been a disappointment who can't sing at all. I do believe it's Ace's goal to "not impress anyone and to just make them cry," which is why Rogers probably took such a shine to him. His nearly intriguing "ambiguous" nature has devolved into teenage girl timidity and I just don't have it in me to muster strong enough feelings to care about disliking him anymore. Though if he somehow manages to pull a move even lamer than his scar-showing fiasco of last week I probably eventually will laugh so hard I cry.

The Bad
Chris. Oh, I'm sure all the Chris supporters will be all about his performance last night. He calmed it down and yes he sang in tune. It should be enough to let him coast for a few more weeks with ease. But I'm past the point of demarcation with Chris. When I first saw him, I wanted to fit him with a dog collar and make him my bitch. Now, those fantasies have taken an ominous, Tarantinoesque twist. I'd still like to collar him, but I'd like to stuff him in a box and leave it in the basement.

Bucky. What the fuck, Bucky? That's all I can say about that.

Kellie. Okay. She sang well enough last night. But I think it's utterly appalling that someone would sit on national television and insist that they are genuinely ignorant. I don't think it's a crime to be stupid. It happens. But there's a chasm between stupid and ignorant. She can try to sell it as naive, but the persona she's projecting is that of an ignorant hayseed. And the more she tries to sell it, the more rickety it becomes, and it's not very becoming. It's a shame, really. Cause she's got a hot body and knows how to perform and if she'd combine that with a foxy, intelligent charm, she could have the world by the ass. But she doesn't, and so she won't. Instead she just comes across as manipulative. Wake-up call: Stupidity isn't a crime, but it's nothing to brag about either.

The Good.

Katharine. I like her less every week. Speaking of the scientology dazed look that Ace gets, it's been rumored that Katharine did a little scientology doodling. That'd fit her. Everything about her is just very calculated and rehearsed, like she's not so much a human being as an Operating Thetan, perhaps a level 3. But she sang in tune, which is really rare among this group.

Taylor. He sings great. He really does. I never thought I'd say it, but I wish they'd shock the Tourette's right back into him though. His song choice was lame, but so was nearly everyone's.

Elliott. He sings great. His song sucked. He had some kinks and problems and built more obstacles this week for himself. But if he survives it, the good news is that it's really not that hard to fix in the future. He dressed like Eminem last week, and all he has to do is take a cue and "lose yourself in the music". When he sings, and when he's into it, he's fine.

I'd made a brief comparison to Van Morrison before, and though I don't want to draw too strong of a correlation because I think Elliott has the talent to be his own and not someone who reminds you of someone else, I think I can wring a little more juice from that comparison. They have a similar appeal, Elliott and Van -- there's a moody sultriness in their voices. But to go further, have you ever seen Van perform before an audience? I have. Apparently, he has wicked stagefright that he still hasn't gotten over. It shows. At first. But then something happens to him as he keeps singing and all the baggage just falls away and there's just this amazing, soulful voice and unaffected performance.

I have no doubt that Elliott can put out a dazzling album (if he's not given utter shit to record, but I'll think about if he makes it deeper into this thing) because his voice is rapturous, even live. But I don't see any reason why he can't just let go and perform either. Slam back a whiskey if it helps to start off, or if that's not his style, then hit a bong. And if that's not his style, wear sunglasses or something. Of course it's harder for him. He's not an Operating Thetan and he's not a microwaved wax figurine and he's not yet a seasoned performer. He's a human being. That's better.

I heard songs of Queen are on deck for next week. I don't know what to think of that. Maybe the narrowed selection will help, cause as is, this entire group is lost, lost, fucking lost right now. Don't make it get so bad again that I pick up the phone and vote for Ace because it's just so funny and wrong. Yippee ki yay, motherfucker.

Monday, April 03, 2006

Opening Day

I'm a big baseball fan, so today is a happy day. One of my favorite friends is a Cubs fan, and here's the e-mail he just sent me:

"Opening day and the Cubs are already out of contention. Fuck."

That cracked me up.

Here's to a long, slow summer with lots of lazy games and plenty of sunny days and surprises.

Best American Erotica 2007

Well, I'd said before that I'd have some big news to announce soon, so here's the first announcement. A story of mine has been picked for inclusion in Susie Bright's Best American Erotica anthology. This is a yearly publication which highlights a multitude of sex writing. BAE 2006 featured works by John Updike, David Sedaris, Tom Perrotta, Steve Almond, and Gwen Masters, among others.

I'm a longtime fan of Susie Bright, and of this series. When I first started writing, I didn't have aspirations, goals, or dreams. I just started typing away to tell a story. Once I began seeking publication, the Best American Erotica series was a benchmark for me. I honestly never thought I'd actually get there. But it was a dream to have, something to strive for. I'm now humbled and honored and so very grateful that one of my stories is going to be included in the 2007 edition.

Million Writers Top 10 Stories

storySouth has released the Top Ten stories for 2005. Slide on over and take the time to vote for your favorite, because there's some incredible work being honored up there. My personal fave is "Famous Fathers" by Pia Z. Ehrhardt. But read them and decide for yourself.

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Simon Says Sing Cinderella

Ok. I admit it. I've formed an emotional attachment. Generally, I don't do that. I'm a single girl in my 30's so I've learned to pick and choose who to cozy up to or else I'd be suffering heartbreak on a weekly basis. Even more disturbing, I've formed an emotional attachment with someone on TV. Generally, I DO do that. Emotional attachments with fictional TV characters are much easier to cope with. I think it was Heather Havrilesky who once said that we're rapidly becoming a nation who'd rather watch "Friends" than talk to our friends. Yeah, sadly, that's me. I have three simmering crushes on TV characters right now. One is Alan Shore of "Boston Legal", and another is Tony Soprano of "The Sopranos". (The past couple weeks had me tense as I sweated out the possible death of Tony.)

But a new darkness looms. The darkness concerning my third emotional attachment. The disturbing part of this one is that it's with someone on TV, but it's not a "character" exactly. It's Elliott Yamin on American Idol:

Yes, I have money on the fool. But I put money on a lot of things and don't get "involved". But this Elliott thing is different. It's disturbing. It's disturbing for the obvious reasons of how painfully cheezy and adolescent it is. But beyond those things, it's also downright wrong. I mean, it's Elliott Yamin. He of the peculiar facial hair and fucked up teeth. There, I said it. I admit it. His teeth are fucked up. Let's move along.

Maybe I'm caught up in the Cinderella / dark horse allure that happened with March Madness. (George Mason, anyone? And, didn't I see a picture of Elliott holding up a George Mason t-shirt about a month ago? Does that mean something? Is the universe aligning to tell us that not all Cinderella hopes are lost?)

American Idol isn't just a popular TV show. Right now, it's a marketing juggernaut that's pure gold for the producers. As the money-making machine it is, spawning tours and CDs and even spin offs, it has to be protected at nearly all costs. The formula of it has to be preserved. And now, in its fifth season, that formula is well known: The pimping of certain contestants, Simon's machiavellian manipulations of the audience to get them to vote appropriately, the "rising star" dynamic.

But doesn't it just feel a little "off" this year. It felt a little stale a few weeks ago when it was already obvious that Chris Daughtry would eventually collect his crown (having to forsake the call of Fuel to be their frontman), much in the same way that seasons three and four were about watching Fantasia and then Carrie gain and grow their fandom and accept their spoils.

But those two, Fantasia and Carrie, their beginnings were different than how Chris started off on Idol. Am I the only one who recalls that even though the show heavily pimped Chris from the start, Simon didn't? Simon, he of the spectacular eye for talent. Simon, who boasts of being able to recognize the "wow" factor. When he saw Chris, he didn't see the X factor and told him he lacked charisma. I almost fell off my chair when Simon said that. What I thought was, "Holy shit, Simon's even more heterosexual than I thought, cause Chris is sex incarnate and women will eat him up."

And then there was Taylor Hicks. Simon was even tougher on Taylor, even though it was blatantly apparent that viewers were going to go ape over him. Simon was so rough and so wrong that when Taylor broke the top 24, Simon recanted his words and basically told him I was wrong about you.

Who did Simon love immediately? Kellie Pickler. They've told us Kellie's sad story from the first time we met her and immediately they built her "image". The problem is, that image is quickly falling apart. It's been said that it takes someone very smart to play dumb. Well, Kellie, the jig is up. We all know you're not as stupid as you act. But we know that because you're not nearly smart enough to pull off being stupid, either.

But while these three sucked up the precious, star-building screen time that every successful idol finalist has been privilege to in the past, we saw nothing of Elliott Yamin. They haven't pushed his hard luck story, they didn't even show his audition. And though Randy falls all over him, Simon's praise has rarely risen above tepid for Elliott, with the major exception of the first week when he told him that he was "potentially the best male vocalist" the show had ever seen.

At this point, I have to wonder about Simon. Is his mojo seriously as whacked this season as it seems when it comes to spotting the talent, or is he even more savvy than I thought, and is he building a "surprise" season for us?

He publicly picked Chris as his winner and then basically sucked Daughtry's dick on TV after Chris gave that wholly average performance of "Walk the Line". I don't believe for one second that the AI machine isn't tuned into the news about itself, and that performance brought about a backlash that had some people wondering if a fucking senate judiciary committee meeting about the plagiarism of that arrangement was on deck. I mean, it kind of eclipsed the whole Vanilla Ice / Queen controversy of pop music past. (Oh god, wouldn't it be great if we'd have some lip-synching MilliVanilli fiasco this season to really heat up the anger backlash?) So this week rolls around and Simon lays into Chris and rips him a new one for doing *exactly* what Simon had praised him for the week before -- doing the same droning bullshit thing every week. Only this time, Chris didn't Creedify the song he sang, he actually sang a shitty Creed song! It doesn't get much more delicious than that for me. Don't get me wrong. Chris is hot. I'd still fuck him. I just don't want to have to listen to him sing anymore. Especially not one more of his shitty alterna-rock numbers by CreedFuelStainedWhatever. Just do it already, Chris. Sing Nickelback. You know you fucking want to.

Meanwhile, in those interim weeks, we've had to endure Ace's out-of-tune, preening, camera-fucking every week as substance-addled Paula nearly has unassisted orgasms over him while we also watch Paris's arrogance become more obvious and see Katharine's nerves make her sing off-key on several occasions. Lisa methodically self-destructs, Bucky continues to underwhelm, Kellie finally shuts the fuck up, and Mandisa? Mandisa idiotically levels a veiled slam against one of her bases by calling out "lifestyles". Bitch, please. Oh yeah, Mandisa can yell and make it sound good. But you know who loves those hard-driving dance remix grooves that are belted out by big women? Gay men in clubs, that's who. Marketing suicide, Mandisa. And Taylor? Yeah. Taylor. His spastic fits are starting to annoy people. Cause people love a gimmick, but what they love even more is to shred that gimmick once it gets stale. But Taylor showed great instincts by picking up on that vibe and standing still and singing a song this week. He's no dummy, that Taylor, but he does need to kick the shit out of the wardrobe department.

So that leaves us with Elliott, who's still largely the forgotten man in the whole mess of this top 10. On a whole, the top 10 show was a fucking disaster, so it didn't bode particularly well that they'd left the prized pimp spot to Yamin, finally. And what the fuck does Elliott do with this prize he's been handed? He comes out dressed like Eminem, doing a tricked-out, funked-up version of a past Idol favorite song while hopping around like Frodo from da hood and he even forgot a couple lyrics. It was a mess. It was a complete fucking mess of a performance. A glorious, energetic, throw-down, stop-fucking-forgetting-me, original and different, best-of-the-night beautiful mess that may have actually put him on the Idol map.

People had been saying the man can *sang*. But then they also said he was too nervous in his big stage performances and maybe couldn't bring it. Consider it brung. And another thing: His teeth? His hair? His what-the-fuck-ever the shallow fucks see wrong with him? I don't care. He's adorable. He's fucking hot. Know why he's hot? Cause he's got the X factor. That's right, Simon. Do you see it, yet?

Here's my question: Have you seen it all along, Simon? Is that why you tossed out that daunting breadcrumb "best male vocalist" of a hook after his first performance, only to then methodically chip away at his confidence every week to see if he'd take the heat and stand up and do what you said and grow up with it? Cause that's exactly what he's done. He doesn't roll his eyes and he doesn't get pissy and he doesn't look glum. He just gets back on the stage and does it different, and does it better. And even when he's fucking up a little, he's still got "it". I can NOT be the only one who sees this rare combination of utter lack of assholery plus bashful charm in him.

Hard luck stories? Word is that Yamin wouldn't ever complain, so I won't picklerize him too much, but let's just say this: His story, it just makes me want to hug him. But that's not the issue. The issue is his voice. His voice, it just makes me want to make out with him.

So let's talk about that for a second. Cause boyfriend doesn't have a voice. He's got A Voice. You know what I mean? I mean he's got a voice that's immediately recognizable as Elliott Yamin's voice. Let alone that he never hits a bad note, it's well beyond that. When you hear Van Morrison, you know it's Van Morrison. When you hear Lou Rawls, you know it's Lou Rawls. And when you hear Elliott Yamin, you know it's Elliott Yamin. He's got that kind of voice. It's an evocative, sultry, emotional voice. In the old days, it could've made women toss their panties to him. Now? We just sit at home and let our panties get wet while listening to him.

They say he'll never win cause he doesn't have "the look". Isn't that the point of being a star? They don't look like other people, they look like -- them, in all their quirky glory. I mean, fuck, Mick Jagger sold a shitload of records in his day, and he banged a lot of pretty women, too.

So Simon, tell me. Are you really such a puppet to popular opinion that you pick your favorite (Chris) and then capriciously throw him to the wolves at the first sign of discord? Or DO you have that eye for talent? DO the American Idol producers actually know how to breathe fresh life into the well-tread competition by changing gears this year and constructing a storyline like this?

Most importantly -- do Cinderella stories still happen? I mean, like I said, I'm a single girl in my 30's. I'm trying really hard here to still believe in happy endings. Is it so bleak that the best singer honestly doesn't have a chance to win a singing competition? Are we seriously, as a society, that moored to our superficial, preconceived, spoon-fed notions about who "should" win based on image? Or does Yamin have a shot, here?

Dark horse, Cinderella, American Idol winner Elliott Yamin. I like the sound of that. It gives me hope, in many ways.

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Submissions wanted -- ShatterColors

A brand new literary 'zine on the scene is ShatterColors. It's so new, they're still building the site. But the submissions pages and about pages are up already. What they're looking for:
Short stories and novel excerpts between 1,200 and 8,000 words in length. Subject matter is anything that occurs within the realm of actual human experience and obeys the laws of biology and physics (i.e., no SciFi, fantasy, monsters, et al); aside from that, no preference as long as it's given an emotional treatment. SCLR realizes "emotional" is extremely general terminology, open to an endless variety of subjective interpretations: we've no wish to restrict authors to the shades of emotion they wish to convey. Authenticity and vividness of the conveyance is SCLR's only real criteria for acceptance.

Help Wanted -- TQR

A new issue of TQR is due to come out soon. But I also noticed that they're looking for help with the next issue. If you're interested, check here.

Monday, March 27, 2006

Ellen Meister in NY Daily News

Ellen Meister's upcoming book Secret Confessions of the Applewood PTA just got a tasty little write up in the NY Daily News! Here's the link. Scroll down and check it out under "side dishes."

Quiction & Tripp

This week's Quiction is up, and G.C. Smith correctly predicted the defeat of Duke by LSU in it.

Also, found a story by Tripp Reade while clicking around. It's a spicy one! Live at Clean Sheets, it's called "Prove it".

Also, all you erotica writers out there, Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz was very cool to pass along a heads up to me regarding a submissions call. I'd love to get on board with this, but don't currently have anything to sub. Click the link for details:

Desdmona’s 2006 Hard-Boiled Sex Contest -- featuring a $500 first prize!

Friday, March 24, 2006

Stories of Strength

I just came across this today and was mighty impressed. A bunch of writers got together and put together an anthology to help benefit disaster relief charities in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. They've published the book and all proceeds will go to help relief efforts. Very cool. The anthology is called Stories of Strength and they've reached the $3,000 mark now. Good on them! I just ordered a copy and I'm looking forward to checking it out.

I found this book by following a link via a comment left on my blog from Jenna Glatzer. I'm just checking her out now, but she seems pretty damn cool, and funny! Maybe we can revive the interview thingy on here and get a guest appearance with her.

*sigh*

Ok. I know I admitted that my bracket was destroyed, but I was still harboring some miniscule hope that I'd be able to pull out something in the office pool if I got the final four and then final two to fall into place. Alas, with Duke falling to LSU, tis not to be.

I just have to say though, I like J.J. Redick. And Gerry McNamara. McNamara finished his college career last week, and I'm sure it didn't end how he'd have dreamt it. As a former athlete, I feel twinges of sadness for him (and now today for Redick) for how it all ended up. But they had stellar careers, and fantastic years and I hope, for their sake, that's what they carry with them: The big picture and all their accomlishments and successes. They both put on a great show this year, all season long.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Hoops -- Idol

So. My bracket is destroyed. Utterly. I picked a couple longshots as upsets, but unfortunately Bradley wasn't one of them. And I also didn't plan on Syracuse getting beat in the first round, despite everyone warning me of the 5-12 curse. Anyhow.

I am a gambler. So I have a new horse that I'm riding to victory. The race, my dears, is American Idol. Oh yes. Even I.

My pick is the longshot:


Sure he's not as pretty as the dumb blonde. But the dumb blonde isn't as pretty as sexually ambiguous blushing falsetto. My pick doesn't spaz out and perform cunnilingus on harmonicas, and he doesn't Creedify every poor song. My pick, he can sing. Sure, sure, some may say he's a train-wreck to look at. Oh, but I disagree. My pick isn't kewpie-cute, but he's not ugly. He's fugly. And I do mean that in the sexiest, fugliest way possible. Hell, I'd hit it!

He can't give me back round 2 of the NCAA. But please, Elliott, keep me in the Idol pool.

Monday, March 20, 2006

A month without cigarettes

So it's been a month that I haven't been smoking. I've given cigarettes up for over three months before, so I certainly wouldn't say that I've kicked it yet. I doubt I'll ever kick it completely, because more than the physical cravings, I seem to have a fairly potent mental connection with smoking. In a nutshell, it's this: I think non-smokers suck.

If you're a non-smoker, or someone who's successfully quit, please try not to be offended by that. I assure you, I'm not attacking you personally. In fact, on a personal level, I think you're great. You're certainly smarter and healthier than I am.

But, for me, the problem is, generally speaking, I've always found smokers to be a whole lot more fun.

I'm not gonna give you a whole bunch of psycho-babble and shit, but parts of my identity are tied pretty strongly with being a smoker. So suffice to say that right now, this rebellion is kicking in pretty hard, so I'm left with this strong ambivalence about giving up smoking for good. On the one hand, I'd like to quit and kick the habit just to prove that I can quit and do it. On the other hand, if I'm successful, I'll be a non-smoker, which is something I've never wanted to be, and is something I still don't want to be.

So which do I want more? The satisfaction of knowing I can change myself? Or the satisfaction of being who I am?

Fucking paradoxes.

Mutual Holdings -- buy direct

Yes I've posted this before, but I've had a decent response so I wanted to post a reminder to keep the info easily available.

In case you're interested in my latest book, Mutual Holdings but can't find it at a Barnes & Noble near you, you can buy it directly from me.

I'm selling these at a deep discount, so the price is cheaper than it is at B&N and this price includes first class shipping. The total price is $9.75 for US residents, $11.75 for Canadian and international orders.

I can't get the little "buy now" button to work properly inside a post here, but if you're going for the US buying option of $9.75, you can click the little button over on the right that says "buy now".

Alternately, for a Canadian or international order, you can visit my webpage here to order.

You can also find several other options on my site, such as how to purchase it along with discounted, signed copies of 24/7 or Trattoria. Again, those buying options are right here on my website.

Thanks. Thus ends the commercial for the day.

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Cribbing Collins

Look, I won't lie. I didn't come up with all this news from abroad. Myfanwy Collins led me toward it. So, instead of reading this post, you could just peruse her blog for a while and follow the links. But things that I know now because of her:

The Million Writer Awards--notable stories of 2005 are now listed. The top ten will be listed on April 1. Congratulations to all of the notables! I am still checking out this list, but I got really excited when I saw Tripp Reade's "Darryl's 1890". listed! GO TRIPP!!

There is a very good interview by Susan Henderson with Ron Currie. If you are a writer and you don't know Ron Currie, you'll know of him soon, and you'll seethe with jealousy ;) And if you're a reader and don't know Ron Currie, you'll know him soon, and you'll be glad. (His novel-in-stories, "God Is Dead," will be published by Viking in 2007.)

Myfanwy is the featured essay this week on Jordan Rosenfeld's blog, and it's a great one!

Ellen Meister was the previous essay, and that's a good one, too! Also, a big clap for Ellen, who just today finished her second novel! (and it's already sold!)

In other news, Don Capone REALLY needs to update his blog ;)

And Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz is back from San Fran! She'll have pics soon!

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

American Cool -- Ruthie's Club

I have a story live this week at Ruthie's Club. I'm very pleased, because this is one of my favorite stories I've ever written. It's called "American Cool 101" and I hope you'll check it out. It's got a great illo by Ted Hammond.

Also coming up at Ruthie's for April 10th is their pirate festival. Gar! I was lucky enough to have a story picked up for that issue, too. If you aren't a member, you can at least get a free tour to look around the site and see if you'd like to join, so do drop by and check them out.

I should have some other fairly big news on here to announce before long. I just like to wait until ink has dried and everything is definite before blabbing, but hopefully it won't be long.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz -- reading live

You can catch GJM reading live, this Sunday, March 12 in San Francisco due to her winning the 2005 Sou-Making Literary Prize Award.

Full details:

Each year, on a Sunday afternoon in March, all prize winners and honorable mentions from the previous year's contest are invited to read from their works at the Koret Auditorium in the new San Francisco Main Library, Civic Center.

This year,the Soul-Making Literary Prize Awards Reading for winners of the 2005 contest will take place on Sunday afternoon March 12, 2006.

Doors to the Koret Auditoriumopen at 12:30 and program begins promptly at 1:00 PM.
A reception follows the program in the Latino/Hispanic Room (across the hall)

Program will include art exhibit, dance and music performance and literary flyers, brochures and other hand-outs relative to individual writers, as well as groups and organizations that support them, will be available.

The event is free and open to the public and will be taped for future viewing as a two hour special on Access San Francisco Channel 29.

Yay! Knock 'em dead, GJM!

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz -- Winner!

Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz's story "Tears" WON the CAROLYN A. CLARK FLASH FICTON PRIZE !!

Congrats, GJM!!

Oh happy day for talented flashers that I know.

Edward Moore -- Nominated

Edward Moore's "Supreme Court" has been nominated by Flash Me magazine for the Speculative Literature Foundation's Fountain Award!

The Fountain Award will be judged by a select jury, and chosen from work nominated by magazine and anthology editors from work published in the previous calendar year (2005). The winner will be announced in mid-May of 2006. A prize of $1000 given to a short story of exceptional literary quality.

For more information, please see their website:
http://speculativeliterature.org/Awards/SLFFountainAward.php

Congrats Edward, and good luck!

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Justin Holt -- reading live

You may recall Justin Holt from the brief interview I did with him on my blog a while back. In case you don't, he's the author of the fast-paced and striking novel Payday.

Justin will be reading on Thursday, March 2nd at Edinboro University. (That's in northwest Pennsylvania, so any Ohioans, Pennsylvanians, and even some New Yorkers will find it a short trip.) He'll be there will other alumni authors and it should be a pretty cool night with live music and refreshments between readers.

Hope to see you there!

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

we'll see

Regarding the list below and the "things I cannot do":

It irritated me to write that out, things I can't do. So it's been 36 hours that I've gone without a cigarette. I realize to you nonsmokers, this doesn't sound like a long time. It is. I don't know if it will last, but I'll keep you posted.

Keanu better hope I'm not successful though. Cause if I accomplish this, I'm coming after him next.

I don't care how much the fucker protests. I know kung-fu.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Tagged

I have been tagged! How exciting, it's my first time, and it's thanks to the always charming Ellen Meister. (Ellen, btw, is at a very exciting point in her writing career, having just received the ARCs for her upcoming blockbuster novel. Check out her blog for more info.)

So the meme she passed along to me is called 7 things. Here you go:

Seven things to do before I die:
1. do something to improve someone else's life
2. create a beautiful piece of art
3. go to Brazil
4. dance a tango
5. quit smoking
6. kiss Keanu Reeves
7. come up with some better/deeper aspirations in life

Seven things I cannot do:
1. ride a bike
2. dance a tango
3. dress stylishly
4. eat cashews
5. quit smoking
6. probably, kiss Keanu Reeves
7. come up with some better/deeper aspirations in life

Seven things that attract me to my mate:
N/A

Seven things I say:
1. Yeah, it's cool
2. Fuck
3. Another round
4. Let's eat
5. Let's drink
6. Whatever you say. But...
7. Right.

Seven books I love:
1. Women (Charles Bukowski)
2. On the Road (Jack Kerouac)
3. Pride & Prejudice (Jane Austen)
4. Jitterbug Perfume (Tom Robbins)
5. Chances (Jackie Collins)
6. Lamb (Christopher Moore)
7. Team Player (Biff Mitchell)

Seven movies that I've loved:
1. Goodfellas
2. It's a Wonderful Life
3. Bull Durham
4. Ocean's 11 (and Ocean's Eleven)
5. The Cooler
6. Moonstruck
7. Scarface

Seven people to tag:
1. Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz
2. Matthew St. Amand
3. Fred Schoeneman
4. Lisa Renee Jones
5. Justin Holt
6. Biff Mitchell
7. Beverly Jackson

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Rauxa Prize for erotic writing

I cribbed the following from GJM's blog. Sounds very cool. All you smut mongerers out there, please feel free to drop me a comment and nudge me toward your story. I'm happy to make a nomination.

The Rauxa Prize for erotic writing carries an award of $1,000, given annually for an erotic short story of exceptional literary quality. An additional prize for erotic poetry carries an award of $300. The awards are judged by a select jury, and chosen from work nominated by editors and writers. All entries are read "blinded" (without author's name available). Publications of any type are encouraged to nominate qualifying material. Each publication may nominate up to five stories and three poems for inclusion; any individual may nominate a single story and/or poem.


The 2005 judges were:
Steve Almond
Leigh Davidson
Bill Noble

Judges for the 2006 prize will be announced soon.


Nomination Guidelines (2006)

The short story award is intended for erotic fiction; therefore any story submitted must have a strong erotic element involved. A short story is defined as a story up to 10,000 words in length. We will consider any original stories which fall within this length limitation, including short-shorts and novel excerpts. Stories nominated for the Rauxa Prize should be from work published in the previous calendar years (August 2005 - July 2006).
The poetry award is intended for erotic poems; therefore any poem submitted must have a strong erotic element involved. Poems up to 100 lines are acceptable. Poems nominated for the Rauxa Prize should be from work published in the previous calendar years (August 2005 - July 2006).

To nominate, e-mail attached .rtf or .doc format files (in standard manuscript format, double-spaced, etc., suitable for print-out) to rauxaprize@yahoo.com. If the work appeared online, you may alternatively simply send us the relevant URL(s).
Work printed out in standard manuscript format, or tear-sheets from publications, may also be mailed to The Rauxa Prize, P.O. Box 4741, Englewood, CO 80155.
For all nominations, please include a statement of where and when it was published, and any copyright or contributor info if you have it.
Nominations must be received by August 15, 2006.
Please note that nomination by a publication also constitutes permission for us to list the publication's name as a participating publication. Please direct any questions to Kate Redfern, Rauxa Prize Administrator, at rauxaprize@yahoo.com.


Eligible Publications

The work may have been published any place, in any form: from the Internet to traditional print, from self-published to mass market. We do not accept unpublished work.

storySouth Million Writers sponsored by Spoiled Ink

The contest is now open and accepting nominations. Good luck short story writers!

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Valentine's with Ruthie's

I'm so jazzed. The always amazing Ruthie's Club has put up a story of mine and given it a killer illustration for their Valentine's edition. They did stories (and illos) about love gone right, and about love gone bad. My story, "Coyote Blues" is about love gone bad. The illustration by Gloklund kicks ass. Ruthie's Club is a member's only site, but they update with lots of top-notch stories (and they're all illustrated) weekly, along with having plenty of special and fun theme issues, flashes, and cartoons. If you're a fan of literary erotica, do yourself a favor and at least swing by and take the free tour if you're not sure about joining.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Mutual Holdings -- buy direct

I was recently able to get some remaindered copies of Mutual Holdings.

So I now have ample copies available, and you can buy directly from me. I'm selling these at a deep discount, so the price is cheaper than it is at B&N and this price includes first class shipping. The total price is $9.75 for US residents, $11.75 for Canadian and international orders. So if you'd like a copy of the book, but you haven't been able to find it at a B&N near you, you can get it this way.

I can't get the little "buy now" button to work properly inside a post here, but if you're going for the US buying option of $9.75, you can click the little button over on the right that says "buy now".

Alternately, for a Canadian or international order, you can visit my webpage here to order.

You can also find several other options on my site, such as how to purchase it along with discounted, signed copies of 24/7 or Trattoria. Again, those buying options are right here on my website.

Million Writers Award

Thanks to the lovely and talented Myfanwy Collins, I realized that this year's storySouth's Million Writers Award for Fiction is about to kick off. Nominations begin on February 15th. This year, the award is being sponsored by Spoiled Ink, which is a terrific writer's community in its own right. As such, first prize gets $300. storySouth does incur some serious expense by putting this on though, so you're also welcome to make a donation to them. The complete Rules can be found here.

Last year, Alicia Gifford took top prize with her phenomenal "Toggling the Switch".

Remember, stories published online in 2005, over 1,000 words are eligible. So if you recall a favorite story of last year, get ready to nominate it on Tuesday the 15th. And if you're looking for suggestions, the aforementioned Ms. Collins is compiling a rather large list for your reading pleasure!

I haven't settled on what story I'm nominating yet. So if you'd like to drop me a note and suggest one, please do.

And thanks to storySouth for doing this. It brings a lot of attention to internet published fiction, and the writers.

Dallas Reunion

Edward Moore can be found in the latest issue of Thirst for Fire with his story Dallas Reunion. Congrats, Edward!

Friday, February 03, 2006

Jody Raffoul profile by Matt St. Amand

The latest issue of The Drive features a terrific profile of musician Jody Raffoul written by Matt St. Amand.

Jody's latest CD is available via Amazon.

And I guarantee you we'll be hearing plenty more from Matt this year. Already multi-pubbed with a brilliant short story collection, book of poetry, and a biting satire, his first novel will be out shortly. You can visit him online at his blog.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Jim Ruland -- Big Lonesome

Since I'm in a pimpin' mood today, I've got one more exciting one. Jim Ruland will be reading in NYC tomorrow night with Sam Lipsyte. The info:

Friday February 3, 2006, from 7-9 PM

The Happy Ending Lounge
302 Broome St.
New York, NY
212-334-9676


Jim's debut collection of short stories Big Lonesome is something I've mentioned here before, but in case you missed it, I'm telling you again. It's been getting lots of good press, and if you're into funky/noir/western/sailor-chic/cool mixed with outstanding writing and riveting storytelling, then it's right up your alley. So go hear him read, and pick up the book.

Army Porn -- Fred Schoeneman

My pal, and incredibly talented writer, Fred Schoeneman has put his amazing novel Army Porn up on his website. You can download it and chip him a couple bucks for it. I've read the novel, and it is well worth it.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

ERIN O'BRIEN

I'd gotten derailed for a while, but I did a little surfing and found another cool writer that I wanted to feature here. I originally found her because we share a publisher, but that led me to her very funny blog. She agreed to a quick interview, so without further ado, meet
Erin O'Brien

Erin O'Brien lives and works in a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio. She's been a mom for nine years and a wife for thirteen. She abandoned her career as an electrical engineer in 1995 to write. She is a contributor to a number of local publications and the editor of the "Broadview Journal." O'Brien contributed a chapter and an afterword to her brother John's posthumously published novel "The Assault on Tony's." John O'Brien authored "Leaving Las Vegas," which was made into an award winning film after his death in 1994.

Erin's debut novel is Harvey & Eck.

From the book jacket:
Harvey is 33. She has a motorcycle, a baby-on-the-way and two troublesome men. Eck has only a parakeet named Dickens--but not for long.

You can find Erin online at her blog, Erin's website, and her novel is available right here: Harvey & Eck on Amazon


1) Who are some of your favorite writers, and how do you think they've influenced you?

I'm always envious of those writers who rattle off names like Proust and Dickens and Tolstoy when it comes to a question like this. I am much more pedestrian. In my younger days, I read all of Fleming's Bond series and all of MacDonald's Travis McGee books.

I love dark work and count "American Pyscho" by Bret Easton Ellis, "Heart of Darkness" by Joseph Conrad, Larry Brown's body of work, and "Clockwork Orange" by Anthony Burgess among my favorites.

That said, I can't say these writers have deeply influenced me, although I do believe the best writers seek truth regardless of genre or style or content.

I am being completely honest when I say that I until I considered this question, it had never before occurred to me that my brother John ("Leaving Las Vegas") has had the greatest influence on my writing.

As I process that revelation, right in this moment, I know that it is one of the tiny gifts that I come upon as I journey along my difficult path of words.


2) What do you think is your greatest strength or asset in your writing? Your biggest weakness or flaw?

Oh hell.

What's next? You ask me if you think I'm fat?

I have a knack for humor, and I am grateful for that. In fiction, I have a devil of a time with plot. I can't tell you how many times I have great characters in wonderful situations sitting there on the page looking at me and saying, "So, O'Brien, what's next?"

3) How'd you come up with epistolary format for Harvey & Eck? Did you ever feel limited by it while you were writing, wishing you hadn't used that format? Or did it work out as you'd envisioned?

There is something voyeuristic about reading someone else's letters. It is a bit naughty and satisfying. I was completely satisfied with the results when I was ensconced in the project as well as when I was trying to place the book. I still would not have the book any other way. The only times I was disgusted about the epistolary format was when I'd get a rejection that blamed the letters as being "too
limiting."

4) You're very funny on your blog. Is humor something you try to work into your fiction? And what are you working on now?

I rarely try to write humor. Something is either funny or it isn't. When my writing is funny, it's because something humorous grew organically from the text. This is true of both my fiction and non-fiction (and my blog is largely non-fiction).

My blog, which has been my primary resource for the promotion of my book and my writing, has been taking a lot of my time and energy. Other than that, I'm always gunning for a paying market, a teaching gig or newspaper essay. And I'm at work on an emotionally grueling memoir.

5) What do you find to be the most difficult part of writing and/or publishing? What's the greatest reward? Is it worth it? Or is writing something you'd do even if there was zero payoff?

The rejection is very difficult. But when you're gliding on the words, that is beautiful. And then there's all the writer buddies you amass. They're funny and smart. They pick you up when the rejection puts you down.

There is also the personal growth that writing affords. My compassion and capacity for love has never been greater. And it grows every day.

6) Stock question: Dinner with anyone, dead or alive. Who is it?

My brother John, we lost him to suicide in 1994, just two weeks after he signed the film contract.

7) One CD, one book, one DVD and a desert island. What book, CD, and DVD do you take?

Book: The Oxford English Dictionary

CD: The soundtrack from "The Royal Tenenbaums." It's got Nick Drake, Bob Dylan, Nico and the Velvet Underground just to name a few. I listened to this CD when I was grieving my father's death as well as when I was flying around gleefully in my Mini Cooper. It's a wonderful and diverse collection.

DVD: "The Wizard of Oz"

8) When did you first get the feeling not that you wanted to write, but that you could be so successful at it?

That's a pretty ambitious assertion. Actually, my successes thus far in this racket have been very humble, but the ball is starting to roll. Hence, all I can say is that one day I hope to be able to cite the event that pushed me into what I consider my most successful period.

My writing has begun to garner attention and for that I am thankful. This essay that I wrote for the Cleveland Plain Dealer (http://www.erinobrien.us/lbrown.html) got quite a few responses and gave my writing ego a much-needed boost.

9) Suppose you can't have both: Would you rather have respect from your peers and critical acclaim (but not making cash from writing), or would you rather be a bestselling author with the fat coin?

I guess I'd have to take the critical acclaim and depend on selling my body to pull in the big bucks.

*aside to husband, "honey, have you seen my thigh-high boots?"*

All kidding aside, I try to put forth my best possible writing all the time. That is what gives me the most satisfaction and, in the end, it is what garners the most attention.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Envy

Envy is one of the more disturbing emotions humans wrestle with. I say this because I carry a cold belly-full of it once a week.

As a writer, I've felt mild doses of jealousy for others' accomplishments before. I'm not proud to say that, but it's true. But, that's generally fleeting, and I can't recall ever begrudging another writer, any writer, success. Maybe it's because I know how tough it is to get anywhere, so I'm happy and heartened when I see people succeeding in this field. Like, okay, it might be mildly annoying that Paris Hilton got a book deal. But then I think, well, someone else, some WRITER actually wrote the damn thing, and I'm sure they got a handsome payday for it! So it's really not tragic.

Professionally, I don't have any envy. I don't know why. Maybe because I don't care all that much.

Personally, though I get lonely sometimes, I don't envy happy couples, because I've made my choices and I don't regret the ones I've made. Okay. On Valentine's Day I envy happy couples. A lot. But, you know, c'mon.

Money isn't really a hot button for me either. Sure, I'd like more money, who wouldn't? But I'm not really a "thing" person. I don't care about clothes or jewelry or cars so much. I can appreciate some of the stuff, but I don't have an overwhelming desire to possess most things. The only thing I'd like more money for would be so I could travel more. But I've been busy lately and wouldn't be able to get away anyhow. Don't get me wrong. It makes me mentally ill that some people are rich fucks for no apparent reason. But that's bound to happen. And it gives me something to hate on to pass the downtime.

But, oh, despite all these rationalizations and sublimations, I am not the breezy, magnanimous, and cheerful person I wish I could be. Because I do harbor envy. LOTS of it. And it comes frothing out every Saturday at noon. I actually plan my day so that I can do this to myself. If I get up early enough, I go to the gym and make sure I'm home by 11:55. If I sleep late, I put off the gym until later and loiter long enough around the house until it's time to flip on the TV at noon.

And that's when I do it to myself.

I flip to the Food Network and watch Everyday Italian. The host/chef on this show is Giada De Laurentiis, and she makes me fucking insane with envy.

I mean, we're not talking pangs of jealousy here. We're talking full-blown, yelling at the TV, slithering through my veins until it settles in the pit of my stomach, squirming and cold and nauseating envy.

WHY HER????

I just can't fucking stand it.

And I can't NOT watch it.

Fucking Giada De Laurentiis with her million-watt, perfect fake smile. I swear, it looks like she's got an electric wire shoved up her ass as she blasts that fake smile while cooking and oozing her contemptibly aristocratic, exaggerated Roman accent when she speaks of certain ethnic foods. Seriously, have you heard her pronounce "spaghetti"? It's fucking appalling.

And now the Food Network has upped the ante, and doubled my hate factor on her. I thought I'd hit the apex when they sent her on a trip to Rome. And then, they made it worse by sending her ALL over Italy. She strutted around bragging about her grandmother and couldn't stop name-dropping her grandfather at every other street corner. BUT SHE WAS THERE AND I WASN'T! Coozing her way all across Europe on a high-falutin' per diem from Food Network.

Again -- WHY HER???

But now the stakes have risen, and they've given her a whole new show, a whole new way for me to torture myself on Wednesday nights. "Behind the Bash". That's right. Food Network now sends saccharine Giada tromping all across the country to all these swank soirees where she gets to eat the food and drink the booze before the partygoers. And then, of course, because she's Giada and she thinks she's so fucking glamorous, she then hangs out at the parties in her best evening wear.

It makes me sick. SICK.

And I can't stop watching.

And then as an added stab to my heart they had on some special dessert competition last weekend from Las Vegas -- and Giada was the host for it. DESSERTS. VEGAS. And I wasn't there. And she was.

I hope she enjoys her life. Because it's the life I wish I was living, and I know I never will. The best I can do is sit down and choke it back as I watch her schmooze it up.

As an added little shot of envy, she has a cookbook.
Current Amazon ranking: #102

My books?
24/7 current ranking: 252,710*
Trattoria current ranking: 622,255*
And my books have SEX in them!!
* -- I'm quite certain these will be even lower if you click the link

Oh! And one more thing. She did a special Christmas show, where she cooked Christmas dinner for whole family -- and she used STORE-BOUGHT JARRED SAUCE. I can't even begin to express to you how WRONG that is. It'd be so many shades of wrong for any self-respecting American-Italian to serve commercial jarred sauce to their entire family at Christmas. But for a chef? Bitch, please.

Monday, January 30, 2006

For Me It's You

Train's latest CD goes on sale tomorrow. You can Amazon it here: For Me It's You. It's great. Check it out.

Funny, smart, hot, expired

This just in from Salon: Funny women a turnoff for men.

*sigh*

Naturally, I'll capitulate and qualify everything first:
1) I don't fancy myself as funny. But someday, I'd like to be funny.
2) Yes, I realize most of these "studies" are seriously circumspect.

But are there any other Salon readers out there? If so, do you bother to even skim the new "letters" format? A while back, Salon underwent a horrible, nearly disfiguring facelift that makes site navigation fairly sucky, and went with a blog approach. In this facelift, they did away with letters to the editor and replaced that with comments on the blog articles.

The vitriol that female writers inspire in these comments is jaw-dropping. Seriously. Be it the outlandish Ayelet Waldman or the more flouncy (and seemingly harmless) Rebecca Traister or Ann Marlowe, when there's an article from a woman, and especially if that article relates to anything regarding sex, love, motherhood, feminism or the like, the backlash is nearly staggering. Always, always there's some assclowns (hopefully the same few assclowns) repeating the same things. They always say that the female writers are:
1) Untalented
2) Boring
3) Narcissists
and then they really rev up with these insults:
4) they're old and "expired"
5) they aren't hot
6) they're deluded or stupid (or both)

It's very depressing, and yet, kind of funny. The repetition and vehement backlash is so over-the-top it's nearly a farce.

Friday, January 20, 2006

TQR

The premier issue of TQR: Total Quality Reading is now live! It features a marvelous lineup of stories, including my personal favorite, "Slayground" by Paul Finch.

Who's the ad genuis...

Have you seen this grotesque little commercial? It's the one that NBC is running nearly nonstop to promo the Olympics, but it's also promoting some gas-guzzling vehicle too. This is the commercial where the red, white, and blue body painted Americans unfortunately let one of their tribe fall through cracked ice and become frozen. But does that damper their gung-ho party in Torino? Hell no! They strap the frozen fucker to the top of their SUV and thrash through Italy enthusiastically cheering on their American team anyhow with pinhead babes commenting on how cute the frozen corpse in their midst is. Is that all? Oh no! They then proceed to scrape his frozen, blue flesh and eat it as a fucking snowcone!

Look man. I know some people get pissy about the Olympic coverage on NBC because it's so American centered. And it certainly is. But given our jingoist government these days, I certainly don't expect that to change this year. But isn't there still a line somewhere between brash, irrational patriotism and cannibalism?

Thursday, January 19, 2006

New FRiGG

The new issue of FRiGG is now online. It features fantastic artwork, and two stories by the beautiful Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz.

Congrats Lisa!

Lisa Renee Jones has just made her first major sale! It's to Avon, and it's for her novella "The Hottest One Night Stand". Congrats Lisa! It'll be fun to watch this woman's star rise.

Monday, January 16, 2006

Vanity

There are exceptions, but as a general rule of thumb, I don't like it when people share their dreams with me. I don't mean their aspirations, I mean their trippy little nighttime manifestations of their subconscious. If the person is a friend, or if it's lighthearted, that's fine. But I really dislike it when, say, a co-worker approaches me and says, "I had a dream about you last night!" I'll always ask them to please not tell me about it, but you know how people are. They'll insist on telling me. And always, always they tell it as though it's giving me some insight into myself.

Here's what they're not getting: It gives me no insight into myself. But it might give me a frightening insight into THEM. Perhaps in their dream I wasn't really "me", but I was symbolizing something else. Nevertheless, when the story is relayed it generally reveals that "I" did something to terrorize the person in the dream. This person is generally, for lack of a better term, my subordinate at work. So they've just given me a nice little peak into the fact that they resent me or fear me or whatever. I didn't want to know that. I could have enjoyed my day without hearing that in their most vulnerable state, while their psyche runs rampant, it conjures images of me with duck feet chasing them down a marshmallow staircase. Or, better yet, when I get the full blown resentment dream smashed in my face, like they dreamt that everyone in the office chipped in on a lottery ticket and it wasn't a winner so they threw it away and then I went to the trash and it magically materialized into a winner. I don't really need to know that's how they feel about me, dig? I'd rather cruise through my days at the office with a veneer of polite distance that's been burnished by my conscious and willful ignorance and aided by their sublimation.

But we can't have everything we want. I have to politely smile and then nod and then go "Oh! Ha!" and then tuck my head back down after they've (probably quite purposefully) unloaded this guilt-fest on me. Am I supposed to apologize to them? Because quite often, they stand there, waiting. Expectant. Am I supposed to say, "I'm sorry I had the winning lottery ticket"? Or am I supposed to say, "I'm sorry for anything I've done to make you resent me"?

That said, I'm going to share the discomfort!! Over the past six months, I've developed a recurring dream. In this dream, my teeth are crumbling and falling out, and I don't like it one bit. Basically, it's a psychology 101 dream: It signifies insecurity. I'm not about to lie and say I'm a fully secure person. But try this explanation, too. Seven months ago, I got my teeth fixed. Nothing vain, mind you. But when I was a teenager, I got a tooth knocked out while playing ball. Then, a couple years ago, the replacement tooth got knocked out. Instead of getting another bridge put in, the dentist decided to do a permanent implant. That's fine. Except that it took over a year. For a year, I walked around with no front tooth. I was *incredibly* self-conscious and insecure about it. It finally got fixed, and I'm very happy with the results. But a month or so after that, the crumbling teeth dream started.

I'm not so vain. If you've seen pictures of me, you'll understand why I'm not. But I am vain about my teeth, expecially now. So on nights when I'm disturbed or unhappy or when I've eaten tacos too late, I have this bad dream. I think it signifies insecurity, yes. But I think it signifies insecurity that my teeth are going to get fucked up again.

If the dream ever morphs into something where one of my co-workers is extracting my teeth, I'll be sure to not tell them about it.

Bestselling Title?

Found this nifty little link via Sharon Hurlbut's blog. You can find Sharon in the latest issue of Mad Hatter's Review with her poem "Mirrored Surfaces are Not to Be Trusted".

Want to know if the title of your novel has a good shot of being a bestseller based on its title? You can find out right here with the Lulu Titlescorer.

I didn't enter any of my old books, cause that's water under the bridge. But I did check out the titles for a couple of books I've got in the can that I'm hoping to sell. The one came up at 69% and the other at 59%. So apparently I'm much more talented at naming books than actually writing the freaking things.

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Congrats to Edward Moore!

His story "The Cornbin" took 3rd place in the Sudden Fiction contest for the Berkeley Fiction Review! They'll be publishing it in the spring.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

P&E Poll

Preditors & Editors is holding their annual writing poll again! And this year, not just one but TWO, count them TWO of my pals have been entered in the Short Story category. You can go right here to vote for your favorite. Both "Hadley" by Matt St. Amand and "Canada, Man, Canada!" by Steve Hansen are nominated, and both are excellent choices. Congrats to Matt and Steve!

And, in some self-serving promotion, I'm nommed, too! You can vote for me (or for someone else if you prefer) as author for 2005 and for both my books! Here's the links:
Trattoria for Romance Novel
24/7 for novel
me (Susan DiPlacido) for author

Thanks!

Friday, January 06, 2006

Lou

I adored Lou Rawls. "Velvety" is a term that's overused to describe voices, but I think it fits his. Nobody's singing could put me in the mood like his. Back in the '70s, my dad moonlighted as a jazz DJ, and sometimes when they were in town the musicians would personally stop by to drop off their latest albums to him to butter him up for extra play. Once, Lou stopped by. He ended up hanging out for the whole show and my dad could never say enough about him. He was smart, with-it, and a pleasure to hang out with. Not only talented, he was one cool cat.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Trattoria -- new reviews

So it's a downer that Mutual Holdings is delayed, but I can't complain because I've been getting some late-season love for Trattoria recently, what with the RT nomination and now a couple of new reviews. Here's links to them in case you're interested:

New Review from The Muse

New Review from My Shelf

Thanks so much to the reviewers, Shelagh and Sarah!

Mutual Holdings -- Delayed

If anyone has made a special trip to Barnes & Noble to try and purchase my new book, Mutual Holdings, I owe you an apology because it's been delayed. I'm truly sorry if this made you go out of your way, but you're welcome to e-mail me and I'll try to make it up to you. I'm not sure when the new release date will be, but I'll be sure to post it here when it is actually available.

New Quiction

is right here.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Happy New Year

2006. We'll see.

Here's a way to kick it off solid, with a fan-freaking-tastic piece of fiction. Red Roy by Tripp Reade.

Extra bonus for the pic of Tripp alongside the story! Funny thing, that picture. I've never seen Tripp before, but I pictured him, as I'm sure most of us picture people we correspond with. And, it's probably less than 50/50 that those mental images match up with what I'd mentally painted. And with Tripp, it did! He's even more adorable.